Illegal Alien Invaders Coming To Take The North


(Photo courtesy of BBC)
Illegal Alien Invaders Coming To Take The North
https://freedomoutpost.com/illegal-alien-invaders-coming-to-take-the-north/
SUZANNE HAMNER — OCTOBER 21, 2018


It doesn’t matter what their background is, criminal or not, turn them away with the appropriate amount of force needed to do so. There is no entitlement for anyone to enter any sovereign nation illegally. If they want entry, they can go through the proper channels or sit at the border with no food, no water and no shelter until they get the message to return to their country of origin and apply through legal means. Then, the application will be considered.

“We are coming to take the North.” That doesn’t sound like immigrants fleeing persecution, oppression, or violence against them because of ethnicity. It sounds like the chant of an army intent on invading another sovereign nation in order to subdue it.


If you look at the videos being posted by RT and Infowars.com, how many women and children can you pick out in the group of thousands of men tearing down the fence along the Mexico/Guatemala border? Several were watched and only men could be found. Of course, that could be the cameraman videoing for effect; doubt it. The Washington Times story contained interviews with some of the illegal alien invader women who reported children having difficulty because of the large crowd on the bridge. Moreover, what did they wave all over the place at the Mexico border with Guatemala? It was flags from their nation of origin.


Many media outlets report that Trump is sending US military troops to the US/Mexico border in an attempt to stop the entry of the thousands of illegal alien invaders. In preparation of the illegal alien invaders arrival, voter registration and absentee ballots, with the designation “citizen” already marked, are being sent to the border in Texas. And, naturally, the United Nations, the organization that despises the US, has called for both Mexico and the US to “respect migrants.”

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?
The U.N. special investigator on the human rights of migrants has a message for the Mexican and U.S. governments: Respect the human rights of every person on the caravan heading from Central America and consider each case individually.

Felipe Gonzalez Morales told a news conference at U.N. headquarters in New York on Friday that “there cannot be massive collective expulsions, for instance, in violation of international law.”

Some 3,000 migrants are currently trying to enter Mexico from Guatemala and hope to get to the U.S.

Gonzalez said that in destination countries there has been a trend toward “xenophobia” which has left many migrants fearing to go into public spaces or tribunals “for fear of being attacked or not taken seriously.”

(Photos courtesy of The Atlantic)

So, Gonzales calls all American citizens who expect the government to enforce immigration laws as trending toward “xenophobia”. He “suggests” the governments of Mexico and the US to “respect the human rights” of illegal alien invaders and “declares” that neither can engage in “massive collective expulsions, … , in violation of international law.” International law does not apply when it comes to countries enforcing their own sovereign laws and when any activity is a threat to national security. He also suggests that both US and Mexico establish channels for “regular migration.” Go suck a lime Gonzales – there is no “regular migration” when it comes to crossing borders of sovereign nations. When that happens outside accessing proper channels, it is called illegal alien invasion, which all nations can repel with as much force as is needed.


This is all the evidence needed to justify the dismantling of the United Nations and the expulsion of their “delegates” from US soil.



Hondurans crossing into Mexico to come to America!!!

Wake up you sleepers, this is the real deal, and they must be stopped.

Advertisements

Delaware Supreme Court Sums Up Entire Gun Debate In Ruling

Delaware Supreme Court Sums Up Entire Gun Debate In Ruling
https://bearingarms.com/tom-k/2017/12/18/delaware-supreme-court-sums-entire-gun-debate-ruling/
Posted at 6:00 pm on December 18, 2017 by Tom Knighton

(Photo by the Associated Press)

It’s not often that a court captures a debate perfectly in a sentence or two. After all, most debates are complex things that require layers of discussion.

However, the Delaware State Supreme Court just lowered the boom on restrictions that kept lawfully owned and carried firearms out of state parks. In the process, they summed up what we’ve been saying for years regarding firearms and gun control laws.

The Superior Court earlier upheld the ban based on the “important governmental objective of keeping the public safe from the potential harm of firearms in state parks and forests,” The Court did not believe the regulations violated any constitutional rights.

“But that conclusion is based on the questionable notion — unsupported by reference to any evidence – that outlawing possession of firearms in an area makes law-abiding citizens safer because criminals will, for some reason, obey the regulations,” the Supreme Court majority found.

This is it in a nutshell. That’s what we keep telling gun control zealots over and over, and they still persist in pretending that somehow gun laws will somehow keep criminals from using firearms.

It won’t. We know this because of what transpires in places like New York City, where just this past weekend there was a gunfight between groups of men. No police involvement, just bad guys.

The criminals do not follow the rules, so as a result, gun laws only impact the law-abiding.

Some have argued that this line of reasoning could also be applied to any crime as only the criminals break those laws as well, which is sort of true. The difference is that guns allow the law-abiding to protect themselves. Laws against murder protect me. Laws against guns make me far more likely to be a victim.

That’s the fundamental truth that led the Delaware Supreme Court to their ruling.

At no point will rules forbidding the carrying of firearms actually make anyone safer. The idea that they will betrays a fundamental ignorance in the gun grabbers’ line of thinking. They don’t and they never will.

It’s part of why so many Second Amendment advocates refuse to visit establishments where their firearms aren’t welcome. They know that if they comply with that rule, they may well be the only one who complies with it. The violent felon with anger management issues won’t care. He’ll ignore the law and we all know it.

That leaves me and mine disarmed except for the magical thinking of people who believe these rules actually accomplish anything.

For residents of Delaware, it seems clear that their supreme court has their back. It seems their court understands that rules only inhibit the lawful and does nothing to the criminal except, at best, add another charge they can have leveled against them. If that’s the goal, so be it, but don’t pretend it’s a safety issue.

Rules like that make Americans less safe, and we all know it. If only the gun grabbers would learn that lesson rather than pontificating endlessly on just how superior they are simply because they want to disarm the average American.