Georgia regulators approve new round of Vogtle nuclear costs By Robert Walton


Georgia regulators approve new round of Vogtle nuclear costs
By Robert Walton • Feb. 23, 2017
Dive Brief:

The Georgia Public Service Commission unanimously approved a new round of expenses at Georgia Power’s long-delayed Vogtle nuclear plant, amounting to $141 million in the first half of 2016.
Despite “well publicized setbacks,” according to Commission Chairman Stan Wise, the project is still making progress and is within total capital costs of $3.68 billion approved by the commission in 2009.
But critics say that with the project only about a third complete, now would be a good time to ask hard questions about the plant’s future, particularly as the parent company of project contractor Westinghouse has said it is getting out of the nuclear business, and took a $6 billion writedown partially related to the Vogtle project.
Dive Insight:

Georgia regulators signed off on the 15th monitoring report related to Vogtle construction, but while the decision is relatively straightforward, it also comes at a time of turmoil for the delayed and over-budget project.

At the end of last year, regulators also approved an agreement between stakeholders that ensured customers will net $325 million in savings, and cement a deadline of 2020 for the unties to come online. Vogtle has two operating units that have been online since the late 1980s. Once operational, the third and fourth units will produce 2,200 MW of power.

“The Plant Vogtle project continues to make progress despite well publicized setbacks,” Commission Chairman Stan Wise said in a statement. “I believe that in the long run this project, when completed, will provide reliable, stable and carbon free electricity for many generations of Georgians.”

The PSC’s signoff comes the same week Toshiba, which owns a stake in Vogtle contractor Westinghouse, said it would take a $6 billion writedown related to nuclear construction in the United States. Toshiba acquired a majority stake in Westinghouse in 2006, and is managing construction of new nuclear generation at Vogtle and V.C. Summer in South Carolina. Both, however, are years behind schedule and billions over budget.

MIT Technology Review has said the writedown and Toshiba’s likely exit from the nuclear business could signal an end to new nuclear construction in the United States.

Recommended Reading:

Atlanta Business Chronicle
Georgia Public Service Commission OKs latest spending at Plant Vogtle offsite link

You know that I rarely make comments after posting an article written by someone else. I cannot help it this time. I just posted and article by this person about the fact that Westinghouse is going to file for bankruptcy. Maybe God is watching over us after all. We don’t need no more stinking nuclear plants! Especially not in Georgia. This plant expansion has been a fucked up idea from the start, then they charge each resident with Georgia Power electricity (between the EPA violations charges we are stuck with covering and the fees for this new nuclear piece of shit) an extra $22.00 month, per home.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but if given a choice I would have never invested in nuclear power. Hell if I am investing $22 monthly, I want to pick an investment that will give me something other than death in the end. All of the setbacks should tell people that no one knows what the fuck they are doing!

In case Georgia has not smelled the coffee already, the Georgia Public Service Commission is owned by Georgia Power. Why the hell they don’t just call it the Georgia Power Service Commission, is just to continue the fraud against Georgia citizens. How the hell is it that the residents get to pay for the EPA violations? Georgia Power, owned by Southern Company is nothing but a bunch of crooks!!!

Advertisements

Argument over new proposed costs of reactors at Plant Vogtle

JoAnn Merrigan, WSAV News 3 Reporter

 http://up.anv.bz/latest/kjc15swt6h6nv/img/sprite32.png
It may be a fight to the finish in terms of an agreement on proposed costs for two new nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle. Recently, the Georgia Public Service Commission held a hearing regarding an agreement proposed by its own staff and Georgia Power to increase the “official” costs of the two reactors by up to $2 Billion. Members of the Public Service Commission (PSC) are set to make a decision December 20.The Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) is objecting and says it not a good deal for customers. The organization made that argument at the recent public hearing in Atlanta and has now filed official objections to the proposal with the PSC and is urging consumers to object to the commission as well.

Sara Barczak with the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy told us last month the project is more than three years behind schedule and now approaching a 45 month delay.  She says the PSC staff agreement with Georgia Power means customers who have been paying millions of dollars in interest (on finance charges for the construction loan) will continue to pay. “Customers have been paying these charges for six years now. And it seems you will be paying more over a longer period of time and that doesn’t sound like a win-win for customers in our opinion,” said Barczak.  SACE said in a recent statement that the proposed agreement seems to be a case a case of regulatory amnesia.

A Georgia Power spokesman Jacob Hawkins told us “the settlement agreement under consideration fairly balances the company’s contribution with customer benefits and delivers approximately $325 million dollars in savings to customers during the construction period while keeping the project’s overall rate impact to customers at 6 to 8 percent.”

For additional information filed by Georgia Power along with other material being considered by the PSC click http://www.psc.state.ga.us/factsv2/Docket.aspx?docketNumber=29849

Argument over new proposed costs of reactors at Plant Vogtle

It may be a fight to the finish in terms of an agreement on proposed costs for two new nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle. Recently, the Georgia Public Service Commission held a hearing regarding an agreement proposed by its own staff and Georgia Power to increase the “official” costs of the two reactors by up to $2 Billion. Members of the Public Service Commission (PSC) are set to make a decision December 20.The Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) is objecting and says it not a good deal for customers. The organization made that argument at the recent public hearing in Atlanta and has now filed official objections to the proposal with the PSC and is urging consumers to object to the commission as well.

Sara Barczak with the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy told us last month the project is more than three years behind schedule and now approaching a 45 month delay.  She says the PSC staff agreement with Georgia Power means customers who have been paying millions of dollars in interest (on finance charges for the construction loan) will continue to pay. “Customers have been paying these charges for six years now. And it seems you will be paying more over a longer period of time and that doesn’t sound like a win-win for customers in our opinion,” said Barczak.  SACE said in a recent statement that the proposed agreement seems to be a case a case of regulatory amnesia.

A Georgia Power spokesman Jacob Hawkins told us “the settlement agreement under consideration fairly balances the company’s contribution with customer benefits and delivers approximately $325 million dollars in savings to customers during the construction period while keeping the project’s overall rate impact to customers at 6 to 8 percent.”

For additional information filed by Georgia Power along with other material being considered by the PSC click here